Indigenous First Nation Peoples and the Management of
Cultural Heritage in British Columbia
In British Columbia, Canada,
indigenous First Nations are engaged in a process of negotiating and specifying
the meaning of treaties originally signed with the then fledgling nation of Canada
over a century ago. The process of modernizing these treaties and giving First
Nations equal voice in policy and resource management decisions necessitates
reaching agreements that will not only provide for a mechanism in provincial
and crown policies, but that also establishes aboriginal title to traditional
lands and resources. Hopefully, the ultimate result will be an entirely new
relationship between First Nations and Canada,
whereby indigenous First Nation peoples will be recognized as self-governing
entities within the political structure of British Columbia
and Canada.
Map of Hulquminum First Nations
One area where many First Nations have taken a proactive
stance in employing the past to pave the way for the future is through cultural
resource management agendas. For example, the six Hul’qumi’num Salish Nations of the southern Gulf Islands and southeastern Vancouver Island of coastal British Columbia have begun to work
with British Columbia in the management of their cultural and archaeological
history. The territory of the Hul’qumi’num peoples remains in some respects
remote, but much of their traditional lands are located in the midst of the most
heavily developing areas of British Columbia – Vancouver, Victoria, and the Nanaimo
metro regions. Unfortunately, this means that the record of the past that they
can employ to establish precontact land-use patterns is being increasingly lost
– often rapidly and in large chunks – to development, logging, recreation, and
natural coastal erosion.
Collaboration in such a situation is the only way to
properly proceed. By sharing management responsibility not only can a solid
inventory of the heritage resources within an area be developed, but First
Nation indigenous knowledge and history can also be included. An avenue for
partially building this inventory has been provided by the Department of Indian
Affairs – the Federal Department set up by treaty in the late nineteenth
century to manage First Nation lives – which made available funds for First
Nations to undertake projects that build the institutional “capacity” for self-government.
Utilizing this opportunity, the Lyackson First Nation (one of six Hul’qumi’num
Tribes), along with Coast Research, an anthropological research consulting firm,
formulated a proposal to acquire Capacity Initiative funding to complete an
archaeological survey of Valdes Island – the core area of Lyackson traditional
territory.
A sizable grant was obtained, sufficient to complete the
survey and obtain radiocarbon dates to establish a basic chronology of
occupation and resource use. A similarly funded and organized capacity
initiative was also launched in 2003 with Coast Research partnering with the
Penelakut Tribe. Prior to this collaborative management process little to no
pre-existing or systematic archaeological or cultural resource information
existed concerning Lyackson and Penelakut heritage sites and land use in the
precontact past.
The ultimate goal of all this collaborative work has been to
create a more First Nations-driven management model at the political and
pragmatic levels. Such a model considers the broadest suite of significant
sites and heritage resources, including sites highly significant to indigenous
First Nation peoples (such as sacred sites), but that may not contain actual
heritage objects. Models based on indigenous intellectual property and
knowledge go beyond the predictive models currently used by industry and
Government in the context of development planning, which tend to reflect the
“objectified” view of prior land use.
By bringing in indigenous First Nation people’s intellectual
property and knowledge, management models can become more dynamic then standard
cause and effect models that are grounded in objectified knowledge. These
models are beginning to be developed as indigenous peoples around the world are
starting to be included in management and policy decisions. Although the
development of these models and inclusion of indigenous people’s voices has
increased, there is still a ways to go before we reach a level that is
appropriate for the 21st century.
Further Reading
Carlson, Keith T.; and Xwelixweltel. 2006. A Sto:lo-Coast Salish Historical Atlas. Douglas and McIntyre.
Oliver, Patricia P. 2001. Canada's First Nations: A History of Founding Peoples from Earliest Times. Oxford University Press.
Oliver, Patricia P.; and Calder, Moira J. 2006. A Concise History of Canada's First Nations. Oxford University Press.
Smith, Pamela J.; and Donald, Mitchell. 1998. Bringing Back the Past: Historical Perspectives on Canadian Archaeology. Canadian Museum of Civilization/Musee Canadie.
|
|
Last Updated on Saturday, 03 April 2010 23:27 |
Related Articles, Videos, Books, Or Other Items
|
|
About Us
On This Day in Indigenous History
Sunday, 02 September 1838
Last Sovereign Queen of Hawai'i Born
On This Day: In 1838 the last sovereign Queen of Hawai'i, Lydia Kamakaʻeha Kaola Maliʻi Liliʻuokalani, was born. Liliʻuokalani inherited the throne from her brother Kalakaua on 29 January 1891. On 14 January 1893, a group composed of Americans and Europeans formed a Committee of Safety seeking to overthrow the Hawaiian Kingdom, depose the Queen, and seek annexation to the United States. The Queen was deposed on 17 January 1893 and temporarily relinquished her throne to "the superior military forces of the United States". She had hoped the United States, like Great Britain earlier in Hawaiian history, would restore Hawaii's sovereignty to the rightful holder.
View all events.
|